Showing posts with label mssql. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mssql. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

remove 10 000 records limit

Hi,
Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted afte
r
the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
Is there any way to overcome the problem?
ThanksHere's a not so awesome way:
Create all your tables without data. When they need data you create a
connection in code and snapshot the data out of SQL into your Access
tables.
Frankly, that just sux. I've not heard of a 10,000 record limit in Access.
Can you point me to an MSDN are similar article that talks about this. I
would be interested in looking into this a little more.

> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a
> query.|||We have users using linked tables in Access to connect to SQL Server and
there is no such limit.
Ben Nevarez
"DexterV" <DexterV@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CA155716-7F98-4D64-9318-EF816ADA42BB@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks|||Dexter,
This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
being sent accross the network,
to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in dutc
h)
go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
limit number like 10000
Hope this helps
--
Jan D''Hondt
<Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
SQL database and .NET solutions
"DexterV" wrote:

> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted af
ter
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks|||Thanks Jan,
Actually, I found the max. record limit parameter on the advanced tab.
I should have explored Ms-access options first.
"Jan D''Hondt" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Dexter,
> This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
> being sent accross the network,
> to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in du
tch)
> go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
> There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
> limit number like 10000
> Hope this helps
> --
> Jan D''Hondt
> <Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
> SQL database and .NET solutions
>
> "DexterV" wrote:
>

remove 10 000 records limit

Hi,
Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted after
the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
Is there any way to overcome the problem?
ThanksHere's a not so awesome way:
Create all your tables without data. When they need data you create a
connection in code and snapshot the data out of SQL into your Access
tables.
Frankly, that just sux. I've not heard of a 10,000 record limit in Access.
Can you point me to an MSDN are similar article that talks about this. I
would be interested in looking into this a little more.
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a
> query.|||We have users using linked tables in Access to connect to SQL Server and
there is no such limit.
Ben Nevarez
"DexterV" <DexterV@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CA155716-7F98-4D64-9318-EF816ADA42BB@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks|||Dexter,
This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
being sent accross the network,
to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in dutch)
go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
limit number like 10000
Hope this helps
--
Jan D''Hondt
<Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
SQL database and .NET solutions
"DexterV" wrote:
> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted after
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks|||Thanks Jan,
Actually, I found the max. record limit parameter on the advanced tab.
I should have explored Ms-access options first.
"Jan D''Hondt" wrote:
> Dexter,
> This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
> being sent accross the network,
> to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in dutch)
> go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
> There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
> limit number like 10000
> Hope this helps
> --
> Jan D''Hondt
> <Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
> SQL database and .NET solutions
>
> "DexterV" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> > 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted after
> > the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> >
> > Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> >
> > Thanks

remove 10 000 records limit

Hi,
Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted after
the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
Is there any way to overcome the problem?
Thanks
Here's a not so awesome way:
Create all your tables without data. When they need data you create a
connection in code and snapshot the data out of SQL into your Access
tables.
Frankly, that just sux. I've not heard of a 10,000 record limit in Access.
Can you point me to an MSDN are similar article that talks about this. I
would be interested in looking into this a little more.

> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a
> query.
|||We have users using linked tables in Access to connect to SQL Server and
there is no such limit.
Ben Nevarez
"DexterV" <DexterV@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CA155716-7F98-4D64-9318-EF816ADA42BB@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted
> after
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks
|||Dexter,
This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
being sent accross the network,
to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in dutch)
go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
limit number like 10000
Hope this helps
Jan D''Hondt
<Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
SQL database and .NET solutions
"DexterV" wrote:

> Hi,
> Our users that connect to a MSSQL db via MS-Access cannot access more than
> 10 000 records. In other words, all the records that have been inserted after
> the 10 000th record cannot be access nor from the table, nor from a query.
> Is there any way to overcome the problem?
> Thanks
|||Thanks Jan,
Actually, I found the max. record limit parameter on the advanced tab.
I should have explored Ms-access options first.
"Jan D''Hondt" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Dexter,
> This is an option in the ms-access settings, probably to avoid long lists
> being sent accross the network,
> to augment the limit: I'll try to guide you (my ms-access version is in dutch)
> go to the ms-access menu tools / options, the option dialog box opens.
> There is a tab called edit/find and in there is there is text box with the
> limit number like 10000
> Hope this helps
> --
> Jan D''Hondt
> <Toto, I''ve got a feeling we''re not in Kansas anymore.>
> SQL database and .NET solutions
>
> "DexterV" wrote:

Saturday, February 25, 2012

remote connnect MSSQL 2005 express

Can we remote connect MSSQL 2005 express with IP address?
If can how to done it?
With regards,
Goh
Basically:
1. Enable remote TCP connections.
2. Open the firewall if necessary.
3. Start SQL Server Browser Service if you don't know the port.
4.Specifiy the named instance of the SQL Server Express installation.
For details, start with the tutorial at
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345318(en-US,SQL.90).aspx
Rick Byham
MCDBA, MCSE, MCSA
Lead Technical Writer,
Microsoft, SQL Server Books Online
This posting is provided "as is" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Goh" <goh@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:OECethpFGHA.644@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Can we remote connect MSSQL 2005 express with IP address?
> If can how to done it?
> With regards,
> Goh
>
|||it work thanks.
"Rick Byham [MS]" <rickbyh@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:u9fd6FtFGHA.4036@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Basically:
> 1. Enable remote TCP connections.
> 2. Open the firewall if necessary.
> 3. Start SQL Server Browser Service if you don't know the port.
> 4.Specifiy the named instance of the SQL Server Express installation.
> For details, start with the tutorial at
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345318(en-US,SQL.90).aspx
> --
> Rick Byham
> MCDBA, MCSE, MCSA
> Lead Technical Writer,
> Microsoft, SQL Server Books Online
> This posting is provided "as is" with
> no warranties, and confers no rights.
> "Goh" <goh@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
> news:OECethpFGHA.644@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>

remote connnect MSSQL 2005 express

Can we remote connect MSSQL 2005 express with IP address?
If can how to done it?
With regards,
GohBasically:
1. Enable remote TCP connections.
2. Open the firewall if necessary.
3. Start SQL Server Browser Service if you don't know the port.
4.Specifiy the named instance of the SQL Server Express installation.
For details, start with the tutorial at
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345318(en-US,SQL.90).aspx
--
Rick Byham
MCDBA, MCSE, MCSA
Lead Technical Writer,
Microsoft, SQL Server Books Online
This posting is provided "as is" with
no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Goh" <goh@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:OECethpFGHA.644@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Can we remote connect MSSQL 2005 express with IP address?
> If can how to done it?
> With regards,
> Goh
>|||it work thanks.
"Rick Byham [MS]" <rickbyh@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:u9fd6FtFGHA.4036@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Basically:
> 1. Enable remote TCP connections.
> 2. Open the firewall if necessary.
> 3. Start SQL Server Browser Service if you don't know the port.
> 4.Specifiy the named instance of the SQL Server Express installation.
> For details, start with the tutorial at
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345318(en-US,SQL.90).aspx
> --
> Rick Byham
> MCDBA, MCSE, MCSA
> Lead Technical Writer,
> Microsoft, SQL Server Books Online
> This posting is provided "as is" with
> no warranties, and confers no rights.
> "Goh" <goh@.noemail.noemail> wrote in message
> news:OECethpFGHA.644@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>