Hello!
I was running SQL Trace from my computer (remotely) and noticed that all
activities against this server are slowing down. Queries that normally takes
a sec to execute are taking much longer. Once I stop trace, everything is
back to normal. Local Area Connection graph show network activity under
0.5%.
I have no problems when I start trace locally on the second node of the
cluster (server in question is SQL Server 2005 64-bit /Windows 2003 SP1
Active/Passive cluster). Did someone experience similar problem? What is the
best practices in regards to executing SQL Trace to minimize impact on SQL
server?
Thanks,
IgorNever run profiler on a busy system if you are concerned with performance,
especially remotely. Instead use Trace and send the results to a local
disk. Copy those files to your local server and load them into profiler if
you want to look at them.
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=283790
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uq%23PELbkGHA.4284@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> I was running SQL Trace from my computer (remotely) and noticed that
> all activities against this server are slowing down. Queries that normally
> takes a sec to execute are taking much longer. Once I stop trace,
> everything is back to normal. Local Area Connection graph show network
> activity under 0.5%.
> I have no problems when I start trace locally on the second node of the
> cluster (server in question is SQL Server 2005 64-bit /Windows 2003 SP1
> Active/Passive cluster). Did someone experience similar problem? What is
> the best practices in regards to executing SQL Trace to minimize impact on
> SQL server?
> Thanks,
> Igor
>|||Thank you, Andrew!
Igor
"Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> wrote in message
news:%234eaCcbkGHA.5036@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Never run profiler on a busy system if you are concerned with performance,
> especially remotely. Instead use Trace and send the results to a local
> disk. Copy those files to your local server and load them into profiler if
> you want to look at them.
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=283790
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
> "imarchenko" <igormarchenko@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uq%23PELbkGHA.4284@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Hello!
>> I was running SQL Trace from my computer (remotely) and noticed that
>> all activities against this server are slowing down. Queries that
>> normally takes a sec to execute are taking much longer. Once I stop
>> trace, everything is back to normal. Local Area Connection graph show
>> network activity under 0.5%.
>> I have no problems when I start trace locally on the second node of the
>> cluster (server in question is SQL Server 2005 64-bit /Windows 2003 SP1
>> Active/Passive cluster). Did someone experience similar problem? What is
>> the best practices in regards to executing SQL Trace to minimize impact
>> on SQL server?
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment